Thursday, February 21, 2013

How To Avoid Tax Scams & Make The Most Of Credits

Source: http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2013/02/20/how-to-avoid-tax-scams-make-the-most-of-credits/

MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) – It may be hard to believe, but April 15 will be here before we know it.
That, of course, is when taxes are due.

It’s this time of year that Lynda Mohs works 14 hour days, six days a week. She’s the owner of family-run Mohs Tax Service. Over the past four decades, she’s gotten to know the IRS pretty well.

“The IRS does not contact anybody by email. So if you get an email, you can be assured that that’s a scam,” Mohs said.

Any letter that asks for your social security number or bank account information is also likely a scam. No matter how often that comes up this time of year, Mohs says some people still fall victim.

The IRS won’t ask for your social security number, Mohs says, because they already have it.

“If you would get a phone call or an email that would say, you know, we need to verify some things, give us your social security number and your birth date — that is definitely a scam, and you do not give that information over the phone,” Mohs said.

But one thing you do want to do is make sure you know about all possible write-offs.

For parents, Mohs says there are a lot of education credits that are missed every year.

They can write off things like school supplies, tennis shoes for gym, calculators, musical instruments, and even private lessons if they help with school music or dance.

A private tutor also counts as a write-off, but is often missed by parents.

“They don’t think about that. They just think ‘No, I just wanted to get them to graduate. Whatever it took.’ But when you’ve spent that extra money for the tutoring, that counts,” Mohs said.

Mohs also said the safest and quickest way to file is electronically with direct deposit.

These posts are for informational use only to educate people about their online taxes and the financial world around them. If you found this helpful, share the original article or this one, and help spread the word! With tax season rapidly approaching let us get you the best income tax return you can possibly have by e-filing! Leave us a comment if you want to share your opinion.
 
Please like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/onlinetaxpros
and follow us on Twitter: @onlinetaxpros

U.S. Quadruples Pipeline Tax Break Cost to $7 Billion

A tax break used by oil and gas pipeline companies such as Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP (KMP) will cost the U.S. government $7 billion through 2016, about four times more than previously estimated, Congress’s tax scorekeepers said this month.

The nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation quadrupled its cost estimate for exempting the fast-growing “master limited partnerships” from corporate income tax in the year ended in September to $1.2 billion from $300 million. The annual cost will rise to $1.6 billion by fiscal 2016, the committee said.

The revision reflects the growth of tax-free publicly traded partnerships. They have taken over the U.S. pipeline business and are expanding into the rest of the oil and gas industry, partly by gobbling up dozens of tax-paying companies. With President Barack Obama and congressional Republicans calling for a tax overhaul, the higher cost estimate may make it harder for industry to protect the MLP subsidy, said John Buckley, a tax professor at Georgetown University Law Center.

“A bigger number always means it’s a bigger target,” said Buckley, who as a Democratic congressional aide helped draft the 1987 law that included the partnership exemption.

Canada ended a similar break in 2011, saving an estimated $500 million a year.

Wind, Solar

Lawmakers led by Senator Chris Coons, a Delaware Democrat, are pursuing a proposal to extend the MLP break to renewable energy companies such as wind and solar-power producers. Proponents in both chambers of Congress introduced bills last year that failed to win passage.

Coons plans to reintroduce the bill in March, said Ian Koski, a spokesman for the senator.

The estimate increased primarily because the latest data show MLP’s are generating more income than before, said Thomas Barthold, the chief of staff of the committee, in an e-mail.

The market value of the MLP industry has grown to about $370 billion, more than double its size as recently as 2009, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Pretax income for about 90 MLP’s rose to a record $16.9 billion in 2011, Bloomberg News reported last month.

Last year, the committee estimated the cost of the MLP exemption at $1.4 billion for the four years ended in 2015. The new estimate pegs the cost during those same four years at about $5.4 billion.

Partnership Structure

MLP’s don’t pay corporate income taxes because they’re structured as partnerships, and they don’t distribute taxable dividends. Individual members pay personal income tax on any profits, offsetting to some extent the government’s loss of revenue.

In 1987, six years after large businesses started forming publicly traded partnerships, Congress passed a law requiring them to pay the same taxes as corporations, a rate that is currently 35 percent.

The law included an exception for industries involving oil and gas and other natural resources. Since then, the pipeline industry has mostly shifted to the partnership structure. Two of the biggest are Houston-based Kinder Morgan, run by billionaire Richard Kinder, and Enterprise Products Partners LP.

The law spurs investment in energy infrastructure that outweighs the cost of the lost tax revenue, said Mary Lyman, the executive director of the National Association of Publicly Traded Partnerships. She said MLP’s that transport and store oil and gas spent $113 billion on capital investment from 2007 to 2012.

Good Ratio

“You compare that to even the higher estimate. That seems like a good benefit to cost ratio,” Lyman said.
Corporate tax overhauls outlined by both Obama and Dave Camp, the Republican chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, would lower the corporate tax rate while eliminating some breaks. Any reduction in the corporate rate would lower the cost of the subsidy for MLP’s, even if their special tax status is left in place, Buckley said.

Investor demand for MLP equity securities, known as partnership units, has led a variety of companies from outside of the pipeline business to convert to the form. New MLPs that went public in the past two years include CVR Partners LP (UAN), which uses refinery byproducts to make fertilizer, and Hi-Crush Partners LP (HCLP), which digs up the sand used in the hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells.

Congress expanded the break in 2008 to include companies that transport and store biofuels such as ethanol.

To contact the reporter on this story: Zachary Mider in New York at zmider1@bloomberg.net; Richard Rubin in Washington at rrubin12@bloomberg.net
 
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Daniel Golden in Boston at dlgolden@bloomberg.net

These posts are for informational use only to educate people about their online taxes and the financial world around them. If you found this helpful, share the original article or this one, and help spread the word! With tax season rapidly approaching let us get you the best income tax return you can possibly have by e-filing! Leave us a comment if you want to share your opinion.
Please like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/onlinetaxpros
and follow us on Twitter: @onlinetaxpros

Late law change leads to rejected tax returns

SALT LAKE CITY — Rejection. It’s not easy to deal with, especially if it’s from the Internal Revenue Service.
 
Some earlier taxpayers who have filed electronically have had their returns rejected — and it wasn’t because of a mistake on their part.

When Congress finally approved the American Taxpayers Relief Act on Jan. 2, it forced the IRS to make changes to dozens of forms that many people use to file returns. Unfortunately, the IRS hasn’t corrected all the forms yet.

Salt Lake certified public accountant Jim Hoch with HEB Business Solutions is busy, as individuals and businesses are getting their 2012 income tax information together. He is working on returns every day and has many already completed. But sometimes when he tries to send in those forms, a screen pops up that says: “This return cannot be filed electronically.”

The problem goes back to the end of last year, when Congress was battling over the budget. When it was all over, tax laws got changed, which meant about 30 IRS tax forms needed to be corrected.

“And that caused the Internal Revenue Service to reprogram and to test certain forms that individuals will use when they file their 2012 tax return,” said IRS spokesman Bill Brunson.


Approximately 1,188,000 returns will be filed from Utah and more than a million will be filed electronically. He didn't know how many Utahns will be impacted by the delay.

“The individuals affected, generally speaking, file later in the year, later in the filing season and/or request an extension,” Brunson said.

Many of the forms have been updated already, but some are still in the process. This glitch primarily affects businesses, but individual taxpayers could get rejected too, especially if they are using forms regarding energy and clean fuel credits.

“So if you're expecting a credit for, say you put in an energy efficient appliance in your home, you may have to wait a couple of weeks in order to file,” Hoch said.

The IRS expects to have all the forms corrected by late February or early March. Updates are posted on its website IRS.gov.

The delay will mean some longer hours for accountants.

"I’ll have to fit a lot of work in that would have been done before today. I'll have to fit it in between now and April 15. Thank you Congress,” Hoch said with a laugh.
Keith McCord, Anchor/Reporter KSL 5 News Weekends
Keith McCord began working for KSL Television as an anchor in February 1981. He is currently an anchor on the weekend edition of KSL News. Keith also works as a reporter for KSL's Noon, 5:00, 6:00, 6:30 and 10 o'clock newscasts. Full Bio » 


 
 
These posts are for informational use only to educate people about their online taxes and the financial world around them. If you found this helpful, share the original article or this one, and help spread the word! With tax season rapidly approaching let us get you the best income tax return you can possibly have by e-filing! Leave us a comment if you want to share your opinion.
Please like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/onlinetaxpros
and follow us on Twitter: @onlinetaxpros

Many Investors Unaware of How Tax Changes Could Hurt Them

By

Affluent investors’ understanding of tax-advantaged investments, like annuities, life insurance and 401(k)'s, varies among demographic groups, according to a new poll.

Nationwide Financial reported Tuesday that the results of its recent online survey of 751 mass affluent investors, conducted by Harris Interactive, pointed to an opportunity for advisors to educate clients on the implications of new taxes.

“Our survey suggests that, while some may be very receptive to considering portfolio adjustments, others may need a little more proactive education from their advisor,” Eric Henderson, senior vice president of life insurance and annuities for Nationwide Financial, said in a statement.

The survey showed that women were less likely than men to expect a significant decrease in household income or asset value as a result of tax code changes. Only one in 20 women had met with a financial advisor to talk about how new taxes could affect their portfolio.

Fifty-two percent of female survey respondents said they were somewhat or very concerned that changes to the tax code would negatively affect their portfolio compared with 69% of male respondents who felt that way.

Women expressed less confidence than men that they completely understood the tax advantages of annuities, life insurance or 401(k) plans.

“Time will tell if the comparative optimism of female survey respondents is warranted,” Henderson said. “In the meantime, it’s critical for female investors and their advisors to discuss new taxes.”

He noted that for most married couples, the wife was likelier to outlive her income, making it is important for both spouses to be active in managing their portfolio.

“The lack of knowledge professed by women respondents may be attributed to what appears to be an underutilization of the financial advisor relationship,” Henderson said.  “However, our survey data suggests that women may be more receptive than men to learning more about tax-advantaged products.”

Survey respondents in the 35-to-54 age range were less likely than those older to say they completely or somewhat understood the tax advantages of annuities, but were twice as likely to consider purchasing another tax-deferred product.

These respondents were more likely than those 55 or older to want more education on annuities, life insurance or 401(k) plans. They were less resistant to making portfolio adjustments, with only about a third saying they would not make any portfolio adjustments as a result of new taxes compared with nearly half of respondents 55 or older.

Respondents with $150,000 to $249,000 in income appeared more optimistic and receptive to making portfolio adjustments, according to the survey. Fifty-two percent believed changes could be made to prepare their portfolio for tax code changes, compared with 36% of all survey respondents.

Half of respondents in this upper income range said they wanted more education on annuities, compared with 41% of the total survey population.

“According to our survey data, men and women ages 35–64 with income of $150,000–249,000 may represent the ripest sales opportunities for advisors,” Henderson said.

Still, although most mass affluent investors will be affected by the new tax environment, 60% of survey respondents expressed either unwillingness or uncertainty whether they would meet with a financial advisor to discuss taxes.

“It’s up to advisors to provide proactive counsel to help all their clients understand potential opportunities—even if certain clients may not currently acknowledge a need to have this conversation.”

These posts are for informational use only to educate people about their online taxes and the financial world around them. If you found this helpful, share the original article or this one, and help spread the word! With tax season rapidly approaching let us get you the best income tax return you can possibly have by e-filing! Leave us a comment if you want to share your opinion.
Please like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/onlinetaxpros
and follow us on Twitter: @onlinetaxpros

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Revenue warns of scam emails offering tax refund

Beware emails claiming you are due a tax refund and asking for your bank details.

tax form 
 
The Revenue will never send messages about tax rebates by email. Photograph: Sarah Lee for the Guardian
Taxpayers are being warned to look out for scam emails claiming to be sent by HM Revenue & Customs, after almost 80,000 phishing messages about tax rebates were reported in 2012.

The emails state that HMRC has reviewed the recipient's tax return and found that they are in line for a rebate, then asks for personal details, including credit card or banking details, in order to make the refund.
However, HMRC will never email a taxpayer about a rebate, and posts out payment orders to those who are owed money. The Revenue lists examples of fake emails on its website, which consumers can check.

In 2012, HMRC took action to close down 522 illegal sites that had been sending out the messages, hosted in a number of countries including the US, Russia and Japan, as well as central and eastern Europe.

There was an increase in phishing emails after the HMRC deadline for self-assessment tax returns on January 31, 2012.

Gareth Lloyd, head of digital security for HMRC, urged customers to send on emails to phishing@hmrc.gsi.gov.uk so it could investigate them.

"HMRC do everything we can to ensure customers are safe online and we are working closely with other law enforcement agencies to target the criminals behind this serious crime," he said.

HMRC said anyone who had answered one of these emails should forward it and disclosed details to security.custcon@hmrc.gsi.gov.uk.

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2013/feb/19/revenue-scam-emails-tax-refund

These posts are for informational use only to educate people about their online income taxes and the financial world around them. If you found this helpful, share the original article or this one, and help spread the word! With tax season rapidly approaching let us get you the best income tax return you can possibly have by e-filing! Leave us a comment if you want to share your opinion.
 
Please like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/onlinetaxpros
and follow us on Twitter: @onlinetaxpros

Internal Revenue Service website overrun by taxpayers seeking refund information

WASHINGTON - The Internal Revenue Service has a message for taxpayers eager to learn the status of their tax refund: Please don't check the IRS website every five minutes -- once a day is enough.
 
The IRS says its "Where's my refund?" website and smartphone app are being overwhelmed by eager taxpayers. The agency says its systems are only updated once a day, usually overnight, and the same information is available on the website, the IRS2go smartphone app and IRS toll-free phone lines.

The IRS provides three updates: when the tax return is received, when the refund is approved and when the refund is sent. To avoid delays, the agency says the best time to check on refunds is evenings and weekends.
"I think what we're seeing is just part of the natural evolution in the refund process," said IRS spokesman Terry Lemons. "Twenty-five years ago, you desperately checked the mailbox every day."

Lemons said the number of inquiries is up over last year, probably because it is easier to check on smartphones and computer tablets.

Nine out of 10 taxpayers typically receive refunds in less than 21 days when they file returns online and get refunds deposited directly into bank accounts, the agency said.

The IRS is receiving more than 1 million returns a day and volume is expected to increase in the coming days, Lemons said. About 75 percent of individual filers get refunds. Last year they averaged $2,803.

"Every year our most common question is about people's refunds," Lemons said. "For a lot of folks this is the biggest check they will see all year."
 
 
These posts are for informational use only to educate people about their online income taxes and the financial world around them. If you found this helpful, share the original article or this one, and help spread the word! With tax season rapidly approaching let us get you the best income tax return you can possibly have by e-filing! Leave us a comment if you want to share your opinion.
 
Please like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/onlinetaxpros
and follow us on Twitter: @onlinetaxpros

Tax Case Asks Whether IRS Flip-Flopped On Key Position

  Daniel Fisher
Daniel Fisher, Forbes Staff
I cover finance, the law, and how the two interact.

For decades, the Internal Revenue Service has asked courts to look past the fancy lawyering and examine the substance of a tax-avoidance scheme. Is this really a legitimate business transaction involving an Italian manufacturing subsidiary, two Caymans corporations and a licensing entity based in the Shetland Islands, or is it just a clever way to avoid paying U.S. taxes?

Now, in a case to be argued today at the U.S. Supreme Court, the IRS is taking exactly the opposite position. And while PPL Corp. vs. IRS involves two of the driest subjects imaginable — utilities and taxes — the implications could be much larger. The case asks the high court to make a clear decision on the perennial question dogging regulators in many fields: What’s more important, form or substance?

In tax cases, “usually the goverment argues substance, not form, because the taxpayer controls the form,” said Michael Knoll, the Theodore K. Warner professor of tax policy at the University of Pennsylvania Law School.

Holding to that standard, PPL vs. IRS would appear to be a clear win for PPL. Like a lot of other U.S. utilities, the Pennsylvania company bought a U.K. subsidiary in the 1980s as the Conservative government there privatized formerly state-owned utilities. When the Liberals came to power in 1997, they decided the utilities had been sold too cheap and imposed a one-time “windfall profits tax” calculated as 23% of the excess above nine times the average daily profits of the preceding four years.


The U.S., unlike most other countries, taxes corporate profits globally. But to avoid double taxation it also allows those corporations to write off most forms of foreign income taxes. PPL argued that whatever the form, the U.K. “windfall profits” tax was a tax on its income and thus deductible. The IRS denied the deduction and PPL sued in Tax Court along with another utility, winning in 2010. The government appealed and got two different results in two different circuits, with the Fifth Circuit ruling the tax was deductible and the Third Circuit ruling it wasn’t.

A perfect set-up for Supreme Court review. A group of economists argue the economic substance of the tax should drive the result, while a group of law professors argue the law should prevail.

The U.S. Chamber and other pro-business groups argue the IRS is trying to have it both ways, typically urging courts to look past the fancy lawyering to the substance of a deal — is it really possible a $200 million offshore profit can disappear in a welter of options transactions with a Caymans subsidiary based in a lawyer’s filing cabinet? — but in this case saying the U.K. tax was not a tax on income.

“The self-serving nature of the Commissioner’s current position is a ringing alarm that betrays the arbitrariness of the government’s shifting approach,” the Southeastern Legal Foundation, the U.S. Chambers and others say in a brief supporting PPL.

Law professors at Yale, Harvard, Columbia and other prestigious schools filed a brief in favor of the IRS, however, saying if PPL prevails U.S. corporations could deduct all manner of payments to foreign governments from their taxes, providing a “road map” for those foreign governments to pull subsidies from U.S. taxpayers. They could privatize government assets on the cheap, for example, with confidence they could recover the money later by nailing U.S. buyers with a one-time tax those companies could deduct from their U.S. tax bill.

The IRS doesn’t concede any flip-flopping, of course, saying the U.K. tax was based on the value of the utilities, using a method of computing value familiar to any commercial real estate appraiser: The income potential of the property. But the difference between the two is less than clear-cut, Knoll said.
“On form, it’s a tax on value,” he said. “In substance, it’s a tax on prior earnings over a base.”

The implications go beyond one-time taxes, however. Foreign governments frequently try to dress up their taxes in other forms to help U.S. companies claim deductions, Knoll said, with one example being oil and gas “taxes” that look suspiciously like royalties for pulling hydrocarbons from the ground. The IRS typically disallows large chunks of such deductions, he said.

The form-vs-substance battle also rages over popular tax strategies like paying stiff intellectual-property licenses to foreign subsidiaries that also happen to siphon away all the profits of an otherwise lucrative business.

“Those issues have become much more important because of the importance of intellectual property in the modern economy,” Knoll said.

And hovering over this obscure tax fight is the larger question of U.S. corporate income tax policy. Even the Obama administration has conceded that U.S. corporate taxes may be too high, and while the U.S. theoretically taxes global profits that policy is easily evaded by setting up wholly owned, but legally separate, foreign units. Apple and other U.S. corporations have piled up tens of billions of dollars in foreign profits in those units that they are loathe to bring home and subject to U.S. taxes.

“Most other foreign countries don’t even attempt to tax worldwide earnings,” Knoll said. The U.S. effectively doesn’t either, given the ease of stashing profits indefinitely overseas. The court’s ruling in PPL vs. IRS won’t change that policy, but it could provide more guidance on whether tax strategies stand or fall on the letter of the law, or the laws of economics.
 
These posts are for informational use only to educate people about their online income taxes and the financial world around them. If you found this helpful, share the original article or this one, and help spread the word! With tax season rapidly approaching let us get you the best income tax return you can possibly have by e-filing! Leave us a comment if you want to share your opinion.
 
Please like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/onlinetaxpros
and follow us on Twitter: @onlinetaxpros